Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) · Washington

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center

Seattle, WA · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) workplace, earning a grade C.

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center: 3.7 TCR = 97% of Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center safety composite

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center: 3.6 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2023

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center's TCR rose 4.4 from 3.6 in 2019 to 8.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621512 · Seattle, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Evergreen Radia Imag…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evergreen Radia Imaging Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center averages 3.7 TCR (97% of the Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center TCR series: 2019=3.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=0 · 2023=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center falls in its industry

62 Diagnostic imaging centers (me establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Diagnostic imaging centers (me employers in Washington.

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center (70 employees, TCR 3.7) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center
Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center (70 employees, TCR 3.7) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center has more employees than the Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.1 4.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621512 · WA · Seattle

62 Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Radia Imaging Center 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shared Imaging LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Ventures, Inc. (221-OK-004) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intermountain Medical Imaging LLC 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Assink 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brulotte Farms, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE George DeRuyter and Sons Dairy LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Ag 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Charleston Area Medical Center General Division 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ECI Site Construction Management, Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson - Wilmington 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of New Port Richey 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canoga Base - Bld: 0441 - 15 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Plastics LLC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Busch's Inc 1205 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ozark Ready Mix Company, Inc. 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.