Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing · North Carolina

RAI Main Office

Winston-Salem, NC · ~521 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RAI Main Office runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

RAI Main Office: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RAI Main Office safety composite

RAI Main Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

RAI Main Office held a steady TCR band

RAI Main Office's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312230 · Winston-Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/17
  • PHOTO Bowman Gray Technica…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~521 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bowman Gray Technical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

RAI Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RAI Main Office averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RAI Main Office TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where RAI Main Office falls in its industry

53 Tobacco products (e.g., chewin establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 17 Tobacco products (e.g., chewin employers in North Carolina.

RAI Main Office (521 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RAI Main Office
RAI Main Office (521 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1

RAI Main Office has more employees than the Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.5 0.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312230 · NC · Winston-Salem

53 Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 234 employers in Winston-Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bowman Gray Technical Center 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Monica 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Carolina Tobacco Manufacturing LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RJRT Main Office 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NC0014C300 521 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vidant Duplin Hospital 521 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lear Guilford - Kenansville 520 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field Support Center - 998 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center 4,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds American Inc. Trade Marketing Services 2,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Marketing Services Company 1,600 FTE
NAT-TCR Smith + Nephew Inc. Goodlett Farms Cordova TN. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Industrial Construction, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thunder Bay Community Health Service, Inc CSB 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion Lonning Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate 521 FTE
NAT-SIZE VEKA Inc. 521 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greater Regional Health 521 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2390 - Apple Valley South 521 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.