Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigarette, pipe) manufacturing · North Carolina

RJRT Main Office

Winston-Salem, NC · ~368 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RJRT Main Office runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigarette, pipe) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

RJRT Main Office: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigarette, pipe) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RJRT Main Office safety composite

RJRT Main Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

RJRT Main Office injury rate improved

RJRT Main Office's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312230 · Winston-Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO North Carolina Tobac…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~368 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Carolina Tobacco Manufacturing LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

RJRT Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RJRT Main Office averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigarette, pipe) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RJRT Main Office TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where RJRT Main Office falls in its industry

53 Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigaret establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigaret employers in North Carolina.

RJRT Main Office (368 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RJRT Main Office
RJRT Main Office (368 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1

RJRT Main Office has more employees than the Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigarette, pipe) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312230 · NC · Winston-Salem

53 Smoking tobacco (e.g., cigarette, pipe) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 234 employers in Winston-Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Carolina Tobacco Manufacturing LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Monica 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowman Gray Technical Center - Research and Development 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAI Main Office 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morris Jenkins 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plymouth 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE GE Aviation Asheville 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE 099 CORP 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center 4,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds American Inc. Trade Marketing Services 2,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Marketing Services Company 1,600 FTE
NAT-TCR Minneapolis, MN - Broadway Street 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AMSOIL Corporate 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bird Technologies Group & BEC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Valero Wilmington Asphalt Plant 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE NetPlanner Systems Inc. 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Saint Paul, inc. 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DLA8 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crestron Electronics - Orangeburg, NY 368 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.