Restaurants, fast food · Minnesota

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368

Woodbury, MN · ~90 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Restaurants, fast food workplace, earning a grade B.

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368: 1.9 TCR = 63% of Restaurants, fast food BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 safety composite

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722513 · Woodbury, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/98
  • PHOTO KFC-Lihue #025
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KFC-Lihue #025 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 averages 1.9 TCR (63% of the Restaurants, fast food BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 falls in its industry

1,014 Restaurants, fast food establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 98 Restaurants, fast food employers in Minnesota.

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 (90 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368
Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 (90 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C368 has more employees than the Restaurants, fast food median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722513 · MN · Woodbury

1,014 Restaurants, fast food employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 151 employers in Woodbury, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KFC-Lihue #025 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 26832 - Taco Bell 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OVEN HEARTH 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dortch Enterprises, LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Boy - Owatonna 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiant Change Construction, LLC. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weis Builders - Minneapolis 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelleher Construction, Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 4,307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Services Group 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthEast -Woodwinds Hospital 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodwinds Hospital 903 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper Houston Container 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American International Travel, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 9300 Globe Center Drive CEVA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Diagnostica Stago Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE N&S Waterproofing, LLC. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skanska-Corman-McLean 90007940 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neenah Finishing Center 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity LLC 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.