Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic

Red Lion, PA · ~115 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic: 4.5 TCR = 138% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic safety composite

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 18.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2024

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic's TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Red Lion, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 138% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #62/81
  • PHOTO MURNANE SPECIALTIES,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MURNANE SPECIALTIES, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic averages 4.5 TCR (138% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=18.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 81 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Pennsylvania.

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic (115 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic
Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic (115 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Rand-Whitney Mid-Atlantic has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 4 1 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 18.7 18.7 2 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Red Lion

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 19 employers in Red Lion, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MURNANE SPECIALTIES, INC. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI Sioux Falls, SD 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Byesville Sheet 6965 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bradford Company 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade's Greenhouses, Inc. - Lititz 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE WNDOB Windsor Office Building 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Hills Service Center 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael F. Ronca & Sons, Inc. 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR RED LION BUS, INC. - RED LION 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Lion Bus Transportation 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106300 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6300 244 FTE
NAT-TCR Web Industries Fort Wayne 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Middleton Construction Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR indus 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ida County Community Hospital Inc 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Little Sisters of the Poor 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Red Letters Logistics LLC 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brooks Range Contracting Services 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADAMA Site 2 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.