Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction · Florida

Randall Engineered Wall System

Apopka, FL · ~103 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Randall Engineered Wall System runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Randall Engineered Wall System: 9.4 TCR = 323% of Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Randall Engineered Wall System safety composite

Randall Engineered Wall System scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.2

2019→2022

Randall Engineered Wall System injury rate improved

Randall Engineered Wall System's TCR fell 15.2 from 26.3 in 2019 to 11.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 26.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=26.3 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Apopka, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 323% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #207/218
  • PHOTO TCM Renovations
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TCM Renovations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Randall Engineered Wall System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Randall Engineered Wall System averages 9.4 TCR (323% of the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Randall Engineered Wall System TCR series: 2019=26.3 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=11.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Randall Engineered Wall System falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and inst establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 218 Warehouse, commercial and inst employers in Florida.

Randall Engineered Wall System (103 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Randall Engineered Wall System
Randall Engineered Wall System (103 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Randall Engineered Wall System has more employees than the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.1 5.5 4 4 0
2021 0.0 0.0 6 0 0
2020 0.1 0.1 6 0 0
2019 26.3 26.3 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Apopka

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 119 employers in Apopka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TCM Renovations 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EciService 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pittsburgh 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gray Construction Co 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Deseret Cattle & Citrus 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jaret Construction llc dba WD Site Development 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Nassal Company 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Lines Construction Services, LLC 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Apopka 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR FINFROCK DMC 768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Randall Mechanical Inc 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR FINFROCK 470 FTE
NAT-TCR HG859 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-01227 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01266 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-04514 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 9123-San-Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE CentraCare - Long Prairie Care Center 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethany Rehabilitation & Health Care Center 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Peters LC 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.