Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Minnesota

RAO Manufacturing #2

Minneapolis, MN · ~123 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RAO Manufacturing #2 runs at 600% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

RAO Manufacturing #2: 19.8 TCR = 600% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RAO Manufacturing #2 safety composite

RAO Manufacturing #2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.6

2023→2024

RAO Manufacturing #2 injury rate improved

RAO Manufacturing #2's TCR fell 13.6 from 26.6 in 2023 to 13.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 26.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=26.6 · 2024=13.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.8 · 600% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #27/27
  • PHOTO UNIVERSAL METAL PROD…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UNIVERSAL METAL PRODUCTS, INC TEXAS DIVISION (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

RAO Manufacturing #2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RAO Manufacturing #2 averages 19.8 TCR (600% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RAO Manufacturing #2 TCR series: 2023=26.6 · 2024=13 · BLS 3.3

Where RAO Manufacturing #2 falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 27 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Minnesota.

RAO Manufacturing #2 (123 employees, TCR 19.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate RAO Manufacturing #2
RAO Manufacturing #2 (123 employees, TCR 19.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

RAO Manufacturing #2 has more employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.0 8.1 16 0 0
2023 26.6 23.8 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MN · Minneapolis

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UNIVERSAL METAL PRODUCTS, INC TEXAS DIVISION 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jireh Metal - Holland 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HTT Sheboygan Falls Plant 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Industries 22.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lametti and Sons Inc. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Bi Products Long Prairie 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Street Bakery 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eggs - Big Lake MN 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Orf-Ground Ops 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CONCERN Treatment Unit for Boys - Coatesville 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Grove at Greenville 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bristal @ East Northport 19.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 705 Evansville West 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kylon - London 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scsmt - Sumter Center 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wabur - Burlington 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.