Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing · Maryland

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD

Aberdeen, MD · ~136 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD: 0.3 TCR = 8% of Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD safety composite

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD held a steady TCR band

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Aberdeen, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/19
  • PHOTO Raytheon_Goleta_CA_EW
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon_Goleta_CA_EW (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD falls in its industry

388 Search and detection systems a establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 19 Search and detection systems a employers in Maryland.

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD (136 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD
Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD (136 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Raytheon_Aberdeen Proving Ground_MD has fewer employees than the Search and detection systems and instrum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · MD · Aberdeen

388 Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 60 employers in Aberdeen, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Goleta_CA_EW 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGMS-K705 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HVAFF06 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US VA Manassas Godwin Dr (1030) 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nichols Contracting Inc 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worcester Eisenbrandt 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Test & Balance, Inc. 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAIN GCC- E. Monument Street 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN2 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABERDEEN LOCATION 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABERDEEN PLANT 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rite Aid Distribution 855 FTE
NAT-TCR BRHMALOC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cable Networks : CNBC - Englewood Cliffs 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of El Paso Inc. /George Dieter 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GitHub, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Day By Day Hospice 35-2237665 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plants 3 and 5 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garratt-Callahan Company 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Smith - 600 Raleigh Street 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.