Employer · Texas

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield

El Paso, TX · ~230 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield: 0.5 TCR = 15% of industry BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield safety composite

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield held a steady TCR band

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336992 · El Paso, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO BAE Systems Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~230 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BAE Systems Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield falls in its industry

49 industry establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 industry employers in Texas.

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield (230 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield
Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield (230 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Raytheon_El Paso_TX_ Briggs Army Airfield has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 0.4 3 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.5 0.8 4 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336992 · TX · El Paso

49 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Heights Complex 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE SYSTEMS 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AM General Technology and Engineering Center 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ZXP Technologies 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBI Electrical Systems, Inc 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle Waters North America - Ozarka 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trend Offset Printing Services 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Spirit Construction, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J.M. Wilkerson Construction Co., Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Spinneybeck | FilzFelt 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Holy Cross Hospital Food 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kleen Test Products - CLR 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Janitorial Services 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dart Logsitics Services - Louisville 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-CHI 230 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.