Reinforcing steel contractors · California

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp.

Chino, CA · ~85 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. runs at 364% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Reinforcing steel contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp.: 10.2 TCR = 364% of Reinforcing steel contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. safety composite

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2023

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. injury rate improved

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp.'s TCR fell 4.0 from 9.9 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.9 · 2018=15.7 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 364% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #86/96
  • PHOTO Black Iron Reinforci…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Black Iron Reinforcing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. averages 10.2 TCR (364% of the Reinforcing steel contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. TCR series: 2017=9.9 · 2018=15.7 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 2.8

Where R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. falls in its industry

705 Reinforcing steel contractors establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 96 Reinforcing steel contractors employers in California.

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. (85 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp.
R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. (85 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

R&B Reinforcing Steel Corp. has more employees than the Reinforcing steel contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 1.5 3 1 0
2022 9.4 5.3 9 0 0
2021 9.7 4.4 11 0 0
2020 9.8 4.2 7 0 0
2019 11.1 8.3 12 0 0
2018 15.7 8.4 15 0 0
2017 9.9 2.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Chino

705 Reinforcing steel contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Black Iron Reinforcing, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nehemiah Rebar Services, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR High Structural Erectors, LLC. 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daniel Marr & Son Company 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallo Vineyards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roche Brothers Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Pauma Valley Yard 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunlet Nursery, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Canby Distribution Center 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Cedar Reman, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanley Construction 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Panama City, Fl #00566 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mt. Vernon Soybean Plant 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Builders Inc 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Water Main Cleaning Company (Canton Division) 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trident Construction, LLC 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.