Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services · Michigan

RCO Technologies, LLC.

Plymouth, MI · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RCO Technologies, LLC. runs at 1166% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services workplace, earning a grade F.

RCO Technologies, LLC.: 5.8 TCR = 1166% of Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RCO Technologies, LLC. safety composite

RCO Technologies, LLC. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2023

RCO Technologies, LLC. injury rate improved

RCO Technologies, LLC.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 12.9 in 2016 to 10.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.9 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=10.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Plymouth, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 1166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/31
  • PHOTO Huvepharma 521 W Ind…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huvepharma 521 W Industrial Lake Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

RCO Technologies, LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RCO Technologies, LLC. averages 5.8 TCR (1166% of the Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RCO Technologies, LLC. TCR series: 2016=12.9 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.6 · BLS 0.5

Where RCO Technologies, LLC. falls in its industry

232 Laboratory testing (except med establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 31 Laboratory testing (except med employers in Michigan.

RCO Technologies, LLC. (28 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RCO Technologies, LLC.
RCO Technologies, LLC. (28 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

RCO Technologies, LLC. has fewer employees than the Laboratory testing (except medical, vete median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2018 6.3 3.2 2 0 0
2016 12.9 6.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · MI · Plymouth

232 Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 139 employers in Plymouth, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huvepharma 521 W Industrial Lake Drive 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR G3 Quality Inc 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Atlanta Lab 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbor Freight Tools- Dillon 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamlin Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crossroads Dairy 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse Assembly DBA Grand Traverse Pallet 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zeeland Generation 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADIENT LLC Headquarters 1,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webasto Roof Systems Inc. 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Comprehensive Care Services, Inc. 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11021 648 FTE
NAT-TCR Inzi Controls Alabama Inc 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aging & Adult Services 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Mt. Carmel 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Miyako Hotel Los Angeles 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Everris NA - Summerville 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salo Manufacturing 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Concrete of south Carolina Coastal Conway West 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Denton North 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.