Baseball teams, professional or semiprofessional · Pennsylvania

Reading Fightin Phils

Reading, PA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reading Fightin Phils runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Baseball teams, professional or semiprofessional workplace, earning a grade C.

Reading Fightin Phils: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Baseball teams, professional or semiprofessional BLS 3.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reading Fightin Phils safety composite

Reading Fightin Phils scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Reading Fightin Phils: 107.5 → 114.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 162.3 TCR

Reading Fightin Phils's TCR rose 6.4 from 107.5 in 2017 to 114.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 162.3 TCR.

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 711211 · Reading, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 101.8 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO 2039-OFFICE OF THE C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 200 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2039-OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Reading Fightin Phils in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reading Fightin Phils averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Baseball teams, professional or semiprofessional BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reading Fightin Phils TCR series: 2017=107.5 · 2018=79.9 · 2019=57.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=80.9 · 2022=162.3 · 2023=157.9 · 2024=114 · BLS 3.1

Where Reading Fightin Phils falls in its industry

157 Baseball teams, professional o establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Baseball teams, professional o employers in Pennsylvania.

Reading Fightin Phils (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Reading Fightin Phils
Reading Fightin Phils (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Reading Fightin Phils has fewer employees than the Baseball teams, professional or semiprof median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 114.0 101.8 47 0 0
2023 157.9 115.5 41 0 0
2022 162.3 162.3 44 0 0
2021 80.9 80.9 19 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 57.2 57.2 13 0 0
2018 79.9 75.7 19 0 0
2017 107.5 107.5 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

711211 · PA · Reading

157 Baseball teams, professional or semiprofessional employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2039-OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fiserv Forum 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2905-29050002-0215 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2039-DODGERS SPRING - PHX 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE KNOUSE FRUITLANDS, INC. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Mushroom Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wharf 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAJ Mushroom 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Lawrenceburg 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecker Textiles, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Shore Electric Corp 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 01066-01-01-SUMNER 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 02013-02-02-FOWLER 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittman Waller Roofing Co 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Olympia 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.