Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers · Pennsylvania

Reading Fulfillment Center

Reading, PA · ~90 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reading Fulfillment Center runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Reading Fulfillment Center: 1.9 TCR = 84% of Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reading Fulfillment Center safety composite

Reading Fulfillment Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2021

Reading Fulfillment Center injury rate improved

Reading Fulfillment Center's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.7 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.7 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423710 · Reading, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO S.P.E.P. Acquisition…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S.P.E.P. Acquisition Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Reading Fulfillment Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reading Fulfillment Center averages 1.9 TCR (84% of the Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reading Fulfillment Center TCR series: 2017=2.7 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Reading Fulfillment Center falls in its industry

449 Hardware (except motor vehicle establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Hardware (except motor vehicle employers in Pennsylvania.

Reading Fulfillment Center (90 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reading Fulfillment Center
Reading Fulfillment Center (90 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Reading Fulfillment Center has more employees than the Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423710 · PA · Reading

449 Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S.P.E.P. Acquisition Corp. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR INSOURCE PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS AT YAKIMA 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimball Midwest 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central MO Field Sales - PLANO TX 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mechanicsburg Call Center 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Mile Paving, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.C. Lee Construction & Supply Co., Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bollinger Electric, Inc. 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR L. F. Manufacturing, Inc. Main Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cheyenne Mountain Resort 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison- 34 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indmar Products 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Escalante Generating Station 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Building Supply 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Pest Control, Inc 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.