Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New York

Reagan Residence

Albany, NY · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reagan Residence runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Reagan Residence: 4.0 TCR = 105% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reagan Residence safety composite

Reagan Residence scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2016→2023

Reagan Residence injury rate improved

Reagan Residence's TCR fell 11.6 from 11.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=11.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Albany, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/98
  • PHOTO Coventry Village
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coventry Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Reagan Residence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reagan Residence averages 4.0 TCR (105% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reagan Residence TCR series: 2016=11.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Reagan Residence falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 98 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Reagan Residence (21 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reagan Residence
Reagan Residence (21 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Reagan Residence has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2021 11.1 11.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.6 11.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Albany

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 391 employers in Albany, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coventry Village 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Crest of Burnsville 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casey's Pond 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benevolent Cedar Community - Cedar Bay East 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chambers Valley Farms, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mulligan Family Farm LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dziedzic Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Hollow Dairy LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albany Medical Center Hospital 6,133 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partners/ St. Peter's Hospital 4,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Hospital- Albany 3,868 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Hospital-Albany-SPHP-NY 3,549 FTE
NAT-TCR Carrollton Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a The Madison on Marsh 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2nd Wind Exercise Equipment Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4595 Salem, OR 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westside 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waterville Preschool and SPPS 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kahr Arms 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veritiv Operating Company - TX324 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enid OK FXFE-ENI 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.