Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Emerald Crest of Burnsville

Burnsville, MN · ~70 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerald Crest of Burnsville runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Emerald Crest of Burnsville: 4.0 TCR = 105% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerald Crest of Burnsville safety composite

Emerald Crest of Burnsville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2022→2023

Emerald Crest of Burnsville injury rate improved

Emerald Crest of Burnsville's TCR fell 8.0 from 8.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=8.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Burnsville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/226
  • PHOTO Coventry Village
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coventry Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Emerald Crest of Burnsville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerald Crest of Burnsville averages 4.0 TCR (105% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerald Crest of Burnsville TCR series: 2022=8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Emerald Crest of Burnsville falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Emerald Crest of Burnsville (70 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerald Crest of Burnsville
Emerald Crest of Burnsville (70 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Emerald Crest of Burnsville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.0 8.0 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Burnsville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 243 employers in Burnsville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coventry Village 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reagan Residence 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casey's Pond 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benevolent Cedar Community - Cedar Bay East 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harmony 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Cloud Service Center 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE H2I Group 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Valley Machine 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ames Construction 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosemount Aerospace Inc (Burnsville MN) 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC_6830 1,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems- Burnsville MN 1,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Reagan Residence 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Curtis Lumber Co. Inc. Plattsburgh 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrollton Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a The Madison on Marsh 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4595 Salem, OR 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Senior Helpers of Greater OKC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizons Home Care 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE OH - Whirlpool (Lockbourne) 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orsted - Providence 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.