Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing · Wisconsin
Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant
Mt. Pleasant, WI · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 28.1
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant runs at 853% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 28.1
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 15
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant's OSHA Total Case Rate of 28.1 to the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (853% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant falls in its industry
107 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel establishmentsSafer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 15 injuries shown on this page for Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 331314 - Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,920 hours worked = 104.17 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant (this establishment) | 28.14 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 331314 |
| Wisconsin state avg (all industries) | 4.92 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 14 reportable incidents · 14 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 104.2 | 104.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 28.1 | 16.1 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant's reported OSHA injury record versus its Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 853% of the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing benchmark, Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant's safety grade?
How many injuries has Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Wisconsin, and by nearby establishments in Mt. Pleasant - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~28.1)
Similar size (~31 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.