Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Pleasant Point Senior Living

Mt. Pleasant, WI · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pleasant Point Senior Living runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Pleasant Point Senior Living: 2.5 TCR = 64% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pleasant Point Senior Living safety composite

Pleasant Point Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2022→2024

Pleasant Point Senior Living injury rate improved

Pleasant Point Senior Living's TCR fell 7.4 from 7.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mt. Pleasant, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/273
  • PHOTO Heritage Campus Gree…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Campus Green Hills OPCO LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Pleasant Point Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pleasant Point Senior Living averages 2.5 TCR (64% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pleasant Point Senior Living TCR series: 2022=7.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Pleasant Point Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Pleasant Point Senior Living (44 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pleasant Point Senior Living
Pleasant Point Senior Living (44 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Pleasant Point Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.4 7.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Mt. Pleasant

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 5 employers in Mt. Pleasant, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Campus Green Hills OPCO LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cudahy Place 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Gallatin 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fleming Point 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crave Brothers Farm 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milwaukee South Shore 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARC Contracting of Wisconsin Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ascension At Home Racine 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR SIO International Wisconsin 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Real Alloy Specification - Mt. Pleasant 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wrought Washer Manufacturing 25 FTE
NAT-TCR AHN Brentwood Neighborhood Hospital 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Manor Court of Maryville 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Helms Construction, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 7621-Pdllc-Duquesne University 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Coney Island - 8 & Harper 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reynolds Market-Miles City 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Transportation Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridge at Columbia 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.