Refuse collection services · California

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic

Petaluma, CA · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic runs at 466% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refuse collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic: 12.1 TCR = 466% of Refuse collection services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic safety composite

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic: 8.3 → 15.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2021

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic's TCR rose 6.9 from 8.3 in 2018 to 15.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Petaluma, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 466% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #199/247
  • PHOTO 616 - Nashville
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 616 - Nashville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic averages 12.1 TCR (466% of the Refuse collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic TCR series: 2018=8.3 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=15.2 · BLS 2.6

Where Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic falls in its industry

2,322 Refuse collection services establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #199 safest of 247 Refuse collection services employers in California.

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic (55 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic
Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic (55 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Recology Sonoma Marin - Petaluma Dynamic has more employees than the Refuse collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 15.2 10.1 12 0 0
2020 6.8 5.7 6 0 0
2019 18.1 9.1 6 0 0
2018 8.3 4.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Petaluma

2,322 Refuse collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 153 employers in Petaluma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 616 - Nashville 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDCO Disposal - Armour 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeside 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solid Waste Services of WV, Inc. 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARMING ADMINISTRATION 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dwelley Family Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Valley Vineyard Management 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Certified Vineyard 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 136 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 470 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 169 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solairus Aviation 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Lifesprk at Parkshore Senior Campus 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Merrill Gardens @ Green Valley Ranch 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy Inc. 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Creek Retirement Center 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tangent - Poplar 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE DoubleTree Columbus 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate, Sales & Plant establishment 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stevens Point Hospice 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.