Golf courses (except miniature, pitch-n-putt) · California

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course

Los Angeles, CA · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.1
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course runs at 712% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Golf courses (except miniature, pitch-n-putt) workplace, earning a grade F.

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course: 22.1 TCR = 712% of Golf courses (except miniature, pitch-n-putt) BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course safety composite

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course: 18.5 → 25.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 25.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2018

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course's TCR rose 7.1 from 18.5 in 2017 to 25.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713910 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.1 · 712% of ind

  • DART 25.6 DART
  • RANK #73/74
  • PHOTO RECREATION AND PARKS…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RECREATION AND PARKS, WOODLEY LAKES GOLF (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course averages 22.1 TCR (712% of the Golf courses (except miniature, pitch-n-putt) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course TCR series: 2017=18.5 · 2018=25.6 · BLS 3.1

Where Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course falls in its industry

458 Golf courses (except miniature establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 74 Golf courses (except miniature employers in California.

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course (36 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course
Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course (36 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Recreation and Parks, Griffith Golf Course has fewer employees than the Golf courses (except miniature, pitch-n- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 25.6 25.6 2 1 0
2017 18.5 18.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713910 · CA · Los Angeles

458 Golf courses (except miniature, pitch-n-putt) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RECREATION AND PARKS, WOODLEY LAKES GOLF 22.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Palm Estates and Country Club 21.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vesper Country Club 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Lucia Preserve 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Hotel NYMA 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply-San Antonio (Bandera Road) 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eskridge Operator 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carefree Cottages of Maplewood - Chateau 22.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HUNTSVILLE_AL 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Petsmart Fulfillment Operations 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Western Plus Bradford 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #3021 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.