Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Ohio

Red Bird Logistics LLC

Chillicothe, OH · ~55 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Bird Logistics LLC runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Red Bird Logistics LLC: 7.7 TCR = 119% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Bird Logistics LLC safety composite

Red Bird Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Red Bird Logistics LLC: 0.0 → 13.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

Red Bird Logistics LLC's TCR rose 13.2 from 0.0 in 2022 to 13.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Chillicothe, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.7 · 119% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #142/233
  • PHOTO PAFRA - FRANKLIN
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PAFRA - FRANKLIN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Red Bird Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Bird Logistics LLC averages 7.7 TCR (119% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Bird Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=10 · 2024=13.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Red Bird Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #142 safest of 233 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Ohio.

Red Bird Logistics LLC (55 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Bird Logistics LLC
Red Bird Logistics LLC (55 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Red Bird Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.2 9.9 8 0 0
2023 10.0 10.0 9 9 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · OH · Chillicothe

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 107 employers in Chillicothe, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PAFRA - FRANKLIN 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 420010000 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 37660000 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELINA (OHCEL) 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE IGS Solar 6100 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dolan Lab 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Backbone Power Systems LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus NE Service Center 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adena Regional Medical Center 2,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenworth Chillicothe 2,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADENA HEALTH SYSTEM 2,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenworth Truck Company 2,053 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Champions 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa City IA 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Truss & Panel, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Rosewood Care Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melville 1 Day Hab Offices 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allegan 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE RPAC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marlin Technologies Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.