Skilled nursing facilities · California

Windsor Rosewood Care Center

Pleasant Hill, CA · ~146 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Windsor Rosewood Care Center runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Windsor Rosewood Care Center: 7.7 TCR = 119% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Windsor Rosewood Care Center safety composite

Windsor Rosewood Care Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Windsor Rosewood Care Center: 3.5 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 13.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Windsor Rosewood Care Center's TCR rose 3.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pleasant Hill, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.7 · 119% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #349/739
  • PHOTO LP Johnson City, LLC…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Johnson City, LLC --Princeton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Windsor Rosewood Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Windsor Rosewood Care Center averages 7.7 TCR (119% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Windsor Rosewood Care Center TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=8 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Windsor Rosewood Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #349 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Windsor Rosewood Care Center (146 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Windsor Rosewood Care Center
Windsor Rosewood Care Center (146 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Windsor Rosewood Care Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 2.6 6 2 0
2023 5.8 0.6 9 0 0
2022 8.0 3.4 7 0 0
2021 7.9 4.5 7 0 0
2020 7.2 2.7 8 0 0
2019 13.5 7.2 15 0 0
2018 8.8 5.8 9 0 0
2017 3.5 2.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Pleasant Hill

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 44 employers in Pleasant Hill, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Johnson City, LLC --Princeton 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellington Parc Health Systems 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Del Amo Gardens Care Center 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harmony Physical Rehabilitation 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CG - 001 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leon Farms Inc 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE TES/GEOSCIENCES 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arrow Construction 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0330 - Pleasant Hill 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Concord Feed & Fuel 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02941 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0025-0025-02941 FAC-02941-PLEASANT HILL-CA 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Truss & Panel, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 289 Wilmington 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Bird Logistics LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Champions 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Tool and Mold 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corp 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Green LLC 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Four Chaplains Nursing Care Center 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.