Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · North Carolina

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery

Ellenboro, NC · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade D.

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery: 7.1 TCR = 187% of Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery safety composite

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2020→2024

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery injury rate improved

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery's TCR fell 9.2 from 16.4 in 2020 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=16.4 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Ellenboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 187% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO Common Ground
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Common Ground (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Oak Adolescent Recovery averages 7.1 TCR (187% of the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery TCR series: 2020=16.4 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Red Oak Adolescent Recovery falls in its industry

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Drug addiction rehabilitation employers in North Carolina.

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery (32 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Oak Adolescent Recovery
Red Oak Adolescent Recovery (32 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Red Oak Adolescent Recovery has fewer employees than the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 2.4 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 8.6 0.0 3 0 0
2020 16.4 2.7 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · NC · Ellenboro

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Common Ground 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountainside Residential Care Center 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IL Quincy 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vesta, Inc - Odenton 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thieman Manufacturing Technologies 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Williams Form Engineering Nebraska 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Job Haines Home 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Genesee A&B, LLC 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Welding & Steel 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raintree Construction DBA Rockwell Industrial & Mining 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Double D Meat Company, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluid Mechanical, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guild International, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.