Machine bases, metal, manufacturing · North Carolina

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies

Ellenboro, NC · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Machine bases, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies safety composite

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies held a steady TCR band

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Ellenboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/20
  • PHOTO SENIOR FLEXONICS
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SENIOR FLEXONICS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thieman Manufacturing Technologies averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thieman Manufacturing Technologies falls in its industry

827 Machine bases, metal, manufact establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Machine bases, metal, manufact employers in North Carolina.

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies (20 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Thieman Manufacturing Technologies
Thieman Manufacturing Technologies (20 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Thieman Manufacturing Technologies has fewer employees than the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · NC · Ellenboro

827 Machine bases, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SENIOR FLEXONICS 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holliston MFG (GTS, HTSG) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yanke Machine Shop Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berrien Metal Products, Inc. Headquarters at 460 Post Rd, Buchanan, MI 49107 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Steve Thomas Farms 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Smith Farms 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ron Richmond 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Family Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Oak Adolescent Recovery 32 FTE
NAT-TCR James McGowan & Son Masonry, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cobb EMC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Chemical Frankfort NAI 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1014 - BELFOR Atlanta GA 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franklin Bronze Plaques 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volo Plant 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Automatic Technologies Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia DREMC 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.