Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New York

RED-Rochester, LLC

Rochester, NY · ~116 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RED-Rochester, LLC runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

RED-Rochester, LLC: 2.4 TCR = 196% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RED-Rochester, LLC safety composite

RED-Rochester, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2023

RED-Rochester, LLC injury rate improved

RED-Rochester, LLC's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.5 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.4 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #18/29
  • PHOTO Cedar Rapids Cogen
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedar Rapids Cogen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

RED-Rochester, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RED-Rochester, LLC averages 2.4 TCR (196% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RED-Rochester, LLC TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.9 · BLS 1.2

Where RED-Rochester, LLC falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 29 Electric power generation, fos employers in New York.

RED-Rochester, LLC (116 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate RED-Rochester, LLC
RED-Rochester, LLC (116 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

RED-Rochester, LLC has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2022 2.5 1.7 2 1 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2017 5.1 1.7 6 0 0
2016 3.5 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NY · Rochester

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedar Rapids Cogen 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roseburg HQ 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carty 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elmroad Generating Station 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GLOVERSVILLE SERVICE CENTER-NY09 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cauldwell Wingate Company, LLC 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newport Office 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ajay Glass & Mirror Co 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR SMC-W Knox 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 851 Pine St 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MS Fire Protection Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seppi Brothers Concrete Products Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kearney County Health Services 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young's Plant Farm, Inc. (Farm 2) 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE FST Logistics GC1 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rohrer Corporation - Bensenville Facility 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.