Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Indiana

Red Spot Paint & Varnish

Evansville, IN · ~236 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Spot Paint & Varnish runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Red Spot Paint & Varnish: 4.0 TCR = 122% of Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Spot Paint & Varnish safety composite

Red Spot Paint & Varnish scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Red Spot Paint & Varnish: 3.7 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

Red Spot Paint & Varnish's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.7 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Evansville, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 122% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO AllCoat Technology, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~236 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AllCoat Technology, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Red Spot Paint & Varnish in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Spot Paint & Varnish averages 4.0 TCR (122% of the Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Spot Paint & Varnish TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Red Spot Paint & Varnish falls in its industry

530 Industrial product finishes an establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Industrial product finishes an employers in Indiana.

Red Spot Paint & Varnish (236 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Spot Paint & Varnish
Red Spot Paint & Varnish (236 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Red Spot Paint & Varnish has more employees than the Industrial product finishes and coatings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 0.8 7 4 0
2023 1.3 0.4 2 1 0
2022 2.1 1.7 5 0 0
2021 7.3 4.3 15 2 0
2020 4.1 1.4 9 0 0
2019 6.3 3.8 13 2 0
2018 2.5 0.7 5 2 0
2017 4.1 3.4 9 2 0
2016 3.7 2.6 9 1 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · IN · Evansville

530 Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AllCoat Technology, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelly-Moore Paint Co Hurst 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.R. Meadows of Texas 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Polymer Technology - Harmony 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NSK Corporation 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE TOA Winchester LLC 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer Store 131 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijerstore 256 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR Gary Yeomans Ford Lincoln 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ccb 1 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AccuTrex Products Inc. Washington Plant 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R & S Beverage Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kalamazoo Co. Sheriff's Office 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wagram, NC 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE RiverBend Materials 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chenango Forks Central School District 236 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.