Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Texas

W.R. Meadows of Texas

Fort Worth, TX · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

W.R. Meadows of Texas runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

W.R. Meadows of Texas: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

W.R. Meadows of Texas safety composite

W.R. Meadows of Texas scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2024

W.R. Meadows of Texas injury rate improved

W.R. Meadows of Texas's TCR fell 1.8 from 5.8 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #31/39
  • PHOTO Advanced Polymer Tec…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advanced Polymer Technology - Harmony (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

W.R. Meadows of Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows W.R. Meadows of Texas averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

W.R. Meadows of Texas TCR series: 2018=5.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where W.R. Meadows of Texas falls in its industry

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 39 Architectural coatings (i.e., employers in Texas.

W.R. Meadows of Texas (43 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate W.R. Meadows of Texas
W.R. Meadows of Texas (43 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

W.R. Meadows of Texas has fewer employees than the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2018 5.8 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · TX · Fort Worth

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advanced Polymer Technology - Harmony 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Spot Paint & Varnish 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middleton 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AllCoat Technology, Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timpson Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midkiff Farmers Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seagraves GP Shelling Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Paso Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR LMO 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DELTA Services, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Martam Construction, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiese Sikeston 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Virginia - Non Metals 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&H Electric Co. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE XSF 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aeronaut Brewing Company - Somerville 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.