Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Redding Assisted Living

Redding, CA · ~64 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redding Assisted Living runs at 500% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Redding Assisted Living: 19.0 TCR = 500% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redding Assisted Living safety composite

Redding Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2019→2024

Redding Assisted Living injury rate improved

Redding Assisted Living's TCR fell 2.4 from 4.7 in 2019 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 46.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.7 · 2020=46.3 · 2022=13.9 · 2023=28.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.0 · 500% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #566/635
  • PHOTO Atrium Village
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atrium Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Redding Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redding Assisted Living averages 19.0 TCR (500% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redding Assisted Living TCR series: 2019=4.7 · 2020=46.3 · 2022=13.9 · 2023=28 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Redding Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #566 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Redding Assisted Living (64 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redding Assisted Living
Redding Assisted Living (64 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Redding Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 28.0 2.8 10 0 0
2022 13.9 9.3 6 0 0
2020 46.3 46.3 2 19 0
2019 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Redding

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atrium Village 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GateWay at River City 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copperleaf Village of Ripon 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Elmhurst 19.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Frazee Elementary School 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Arbors at Taunton 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atrium Village 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 117 Arvada 19.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metl-Fab, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cannon USA Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3304 - Cambridge Porter Square 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3242 - Bethesda 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.