Electric power distribution systems · Arizona

Redhawk Power Plant

Arlington, AZ · ~58 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redhawk Power Plant runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Redhawk Power Plant: 1.6 TCR = 131% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redhawk Power Plant safety composite

Redhawk Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Redhawk Power Plant: 0.0 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2024

Redhawk Power Plant's TCR rose 6.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Arlington, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.6 · 131% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #24/52
  • PHOTO Asheville Operations…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Asheville Operations Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Redhawk Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redhawk Power Plant averages 1.6 TCR (131% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redhawk Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Redhawk Power Plant falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 52 Electric power distribution sy employers in Arizona.

Redhawk Power Plant (58 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Redhawk Power Plant
Redhawk Power Plant (58 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Redhawk Power Plant has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 2.1 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AZ · Arlington

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 12 employers in Arlington, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Asheville Operations Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chatham County Work Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spartanburg Operations Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Three Rivers Svc Ctr 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Renaissance Companies 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSQ 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diversified Interiors Arizona 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Construction Company, Inc 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Streams 4 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Streams 3 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agave Solar 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Streams 2 Solar 72 FTE
NAT-TCR Lindau Chemicals, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WellPro Inc. - Williston 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCarty Landfill 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Works 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE creative design concepts inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steelville Senior Living 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester Industrial Control 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Urbana 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.