Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Redmond Heights Senior Living

Redmond, WA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redmond Heights Senior Living runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Redmond Heights Senior Living: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redmond Heights Senior Living safety composite

Redmond Heights Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2020→2023

Redmond Heights Senior Living injury rate improved

Redmond Heights Senior Living's TCR fell 4.5 from 16.9 in 2020 to 12.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=16.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redmond, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #107/216
  • PHOTO Bridges by Epoch at …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridges by Epoch at Nashua (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Redmond Heights Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redmond Heights Senior Living averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redmond Heights Senior Living TCR series: 2020=16.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Redmond Heights Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Redmond Heights Senior Living (30 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redmond Heights Senior Living
Redmond Heights Senior Living (30 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Redmond Heights Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.4 12.4 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 16.9 8.5 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Redmond

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Nashua 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY DANVERS OPERATIONS LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Forum at Desert Harbor 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Woodbury 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE El Rancho Bella Vista LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Foods, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOURSE FARMS, INC. - WA 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dixieland Cherries LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Riverside Presbyterian House Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gregory Container 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dan McKinney Family YMCA 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6243 Deerfield 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Milwaukee 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE K&H Manufacturing 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snavely's Mill, Inc. - Mill Hall, PA 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cottage Grove West (CGW) - Donkel 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.