Vocational rehabilitation agencies · Oregon

Redmond Thrift Store

Redmond, OR · ~98 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redmond Thrift Store runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

Redmond Thrift Store: 9.3 TCR = 245% of Vocational rehabilitation agencies BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redmond Thrift Store safety composite

Redmond Thrift Store scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Redmond Thrift Store injury rate improved

Redmond Thrift Store's TCR fell 2.5 from 8.1 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=23.1 · 2023=22.9 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Redmond, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 245% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #42/67
  • PHOTO Golden Rule Industri…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Golden Rule Industries of Muskogee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Redmond Thrift Store in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redmond Thrift Store averages 9.3 TCR (245% of the Vocational rehabilitation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redmond Thrift Store TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=23.1 · 2023=22.9 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Redmond Thrift Store falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation agen establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 67 Vocational rehabilitation agen employers in Oregon.

Redmond Thrift Store (98 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redmond Thrift Store
Redmond Thrift Store (98 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Redmond Thrift Store has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2023 22.9 22.9 0 4 0
2022 23.1 23.1 0 4 0
2021 4.5 4.5 0 1 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2017 8.7 5.8 6 0 0
2016 8.1 4.9 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · OR · Redmond

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 90 employers in Redmond, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Golden Rule Industries of Muskogee 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchards Store 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tilghman Store 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Aftermarket Facility 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coos Forest Protective Association 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beaverton Quarry 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deacon Construction, LLC - OR 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunset Heating Cooling Plumbing LLC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond School District 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Desert Education Services 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR BasX Solutions 483 FTE
NAT-TCR DeRoyal LaFollette 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Adr Ny Dist LLC 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Forks 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Janco Industries, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE J.H. Berra Construction Co., Inc. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penny Plate - Virginia 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wm Blanchard Co 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE FLA 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.