Boxed meats produced in slaughtering plants · Iowa

Redwood Farms Meat Processors

Estherville, IA · ~130 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redwood Farms Meat Processors runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxed meats produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Redwood Farms Meat Processors: 4.8 TCR = 144% of Boxed meats produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redwood Farms Meat Processors safety composite

Redwood Farms Meat Processors scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2024

Redwood Farms Meat Processors injury rate improved

Redwood Farms Meat Processors's TCR fell 1.6 from 5.5 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Estherville, IA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 144% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #12/26
  • PHOTO Primary Beef - Wyalu…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primary Beef - Wyalusing PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Redwood Farms Meat Processors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redwood Farms Meat Processors averages 4.8 TCR (144% of the Boxed meats produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redwood Farms Meat Processors TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Redwood Farms Meat Processors falls in its industry

212 Boxed meats produced in slaugh establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 26 Boxed meats produced in slaugh employers in Iowa.

Redwood Farms Meat Processors (130 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redwood Farms Meat Processors
Redwood Farms Meat Processors (130 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Redwood Farms Meat Processors has fewer employees than the Boxed meats produced in slaughtering pla median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.3 6 0 0
2023 2.6 1.3 4 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 3.3 2.8 5 1 0
2019 11.4 10.1 17 0 0
2018 6.6 4.1 8 0 0
2017 5.5 3.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · IA · Estherville

212 Boxed meats produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 17 employers in Estherville, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primary Beef - Wyalusing PA 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marin Sun Farms Inc 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnsonville- Holton 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Packing Co Inc 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2512-Boone, IA 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE CITY OF VINTON 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kinzler Construction Services - Ankeny 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone Electrical Manufacturing 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avera Holy Family Hospital 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Armstrong Wheels - Estherville 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moveero Estherville Iowa 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estherville Foods Inc 87 FTE
NAT-TCR Public Works 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Hyatt New York 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6380 Riverview 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 2389 Kuykendahl 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE BelGioioso Cheese - New Denmark 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paisano Service & Supply LLC. 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheehan Brothers Vending Service Inc. 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.