Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance · Arizona

Refrigeration Systems

Mesa, AZ · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Refrigeration Systems runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance workplace, earning a grade D.

Refrigeration Systems: 3.5 TCR = 167% of Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Refrigeration Systems safety composite

Refrigeration Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Refrigeration Systems: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2019

Refrigeration Systems's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Mesa, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 167% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #25/34
  • PHOTO STS Operating - Delhi
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STS Operating - Delhi (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Refrigeration Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Refrigeration Systems averages 3.5 TCR (167% of the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Refrigeration Systems TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Refrigeration Systems falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Mach establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 34 Commercial and Industrial Mach employers in Arizona.

Refrigeration Systems (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Refrigeration Systems
Refrigeration Systems (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Refrigeration Systems has fewer employees than the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · AZ · Mesa

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STS Operating - Delhi 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPATCO Energy Solutions, LLC - Columbia Branch 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Rutherford, NJ 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heubel Material Handling, Inc./Earth City MO 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verde River Growers, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (AZ) 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Todd Whittaker Drywall Inc 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Hardeman County 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne White Counties Electric Cooperative 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford County Facilities 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Middleburg Legacy Place 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beaman 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vineyard Management 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manassas SSG27 EPG28 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Trans Environmental Services, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.