Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Hawaii

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station

Honolulu, HI · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station: 2.9 TCR = 243% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station safety composite

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station: 0.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.55× in 2019

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station's TCR rose 4.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Honolulu, HI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 243% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Water Pollution Cont…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Water Pollution Control Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station averages 2.9 TCR (243% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=4.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Hawaii.

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station (23 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station
Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station (23 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station has fewer employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · HI · Honolulu

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Water Pollution Control Facility 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Treatment Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Service Authority 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WW2 - REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sugarland Farms, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haleiwa - Oahu, HI 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 12634 PAC BUILD, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goto Construction, Inc 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9095-HNL 5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNL HONOLULUL 4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawaiian Airlines - HNL 4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES 2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR Seminole Villa, Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 02-TTCO-TUSCALOOSA 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR kj market st. andrews 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rs-Rinaldi West Valley 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 40146 - Capstone Sysco Boston 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trans Equipment Co., Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pipestone Veterinary Services Warehouse 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE US NV Reno 8645 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.