Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities · Michigan

Regency at Shelby Township

Shelby Township, MI · ~166 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency at Shelby Township runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency at Shelby Township: 13.8 TCR = 212% of Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency at Shelby Township safety composite

Regency at Shelby Township scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2022→2024

Regency at Shelby Township injury rate improved

Regency at Shelby Township's TCR fell 7.1 from 13.4 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.4 · 2023=21.6 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Shelby Township, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 212% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #401/471
  • PHOTO St Joseph Rehab and …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St Joseph Rehab and Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Regency at Shelby Township in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency at Shelby Township averages 13.8 TCR (212% of the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency at Shelby Township TCR series: 2022=13.4 · 2023=21.6 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Regency at Shelby Township falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skille establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #401 safest of 471 Nursing Care Facilities Skille employers in Michigan.

Regency at Shelby Township (166 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency at Shelby Township
Regency at Shelby Township (166 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Regency at Shelby Township has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 2.0 16 0 0
2023 21.6 19.3 14 14 0
2022 13.4 13.4 5 19 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Shelby Township

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 86 employers in Shelby Township, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St Joseph Rehab and Nursing Center 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NorthChase Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apple Valley Center 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mitchell Plastics Sterling Heights 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Jordan Plastics East Jordan 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Standard 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2169_3882 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET2 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dan's Excavating, Inc. 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 4 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayco Shelby 320 FTE
NAT-TCR 2235 - Riverview 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Phase Electric, Inc 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Winnetka Water & Electric Department 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa de Amparo 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Laurels of Massillon 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walker Rehabilitation Center, inc. 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Marketing Systems, Inc. 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott Vacation Club Pulse San Diego 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.