Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin

New Berlin, WI · ~102 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin: 2.4 TCR = 62% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin safety composite

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2021

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin injury rate improved

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · New Berlin, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/171
  • PHOTO Focused Care at Gilmer
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Focused Care at Gilmer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Senior Communities New Berlin averages 2.4 TCR (62% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Regency Senior Communities New Berlin falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin (102 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Senior Communities New Berlin
Regency Senior Communities New Berlin (102 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Regency Senior Communities New Berlin has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2016 3.7 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · New Berlin

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 183 employers in New Berlin, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Gilmer 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Court 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Terrace Senior Housing of Gaylord 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Clinton 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Foods, Inc Manitowoc Plant 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holton Brothers, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fromm Family Foods, LLC. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clasen Quality Chocolate - Corporate 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pieper Electric, Inc. 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5531 502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Office 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (New Berlin) 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Centerville (#44) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Electronics Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunoco Transportation SWS 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fern Terrace of Bowling Green 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE LGE-KU Mill Creek Generating Station 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seaman Paper Company Paper Mill 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLE-SPUSA 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE EaglePicher Technologies, LLC/Seneca Facility 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.