Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Regency Woodland

Salem, OR · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Woodland runs at 492% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Woodland: 18.7 TCR = 492% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Woodland safety composite

Regency Woodland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency Woodland: 12.5 → 32.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 32.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2023

Regency Woodland's TCR rose 20.4 from 12.5 in 2016 to 32.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Salem, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.7 · 492% of ind

  • DART 18.2 DART
  • RANK #191/218
  • PHOTO Dirigo Pines
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dirigo Pines (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Regency Woodland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Woodland averages 18.7 TCR (492% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Woodland TCR series: 2016=12.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=21 · 2020=25.4 · 2021=27.3 · 2022=12 · 2023=32.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Regency Woodland falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #191 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Regency Woodland (30 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Woodland
Regency Woodland (30 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Regency Woodland has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 32.8 18.2 9 0 0
2022 12.0 12.0 3 0 0
2021 27.3 27.3 2 4 0
2020 25.4 12.7 4 2 0
2019 21.0 21.0 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 12.5 12.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Salem

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dirigo Pines 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grande Ronde Retirement 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Colonnade at Carrollwood 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbor House 18.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siri Produce Inc. (Jack) 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sweetheart Orchards, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Botanicals 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coos Bay Area 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR 1440 Ctv34 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crestwood Center Sacramento 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Sunwest IL 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-ILM-WILMINGTON-ILM-PDMT 18.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE KC/GHQ 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashtabula Shop - Lakeshore 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Endura Products Inc-Wood Plant 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entergy Sterlington/Perryville Plant 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.