Mental health facilities, residential · California

Crestwood Center Sacramento

Sacramento, CA · ~122 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crestwood Center Sacramento runs at 492% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mental health facilities, residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Crestwood Center Sacramento: 18.7 TCR = 492% of Mental health facilities, residential BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crestwood Center Sacramento safety composite

Crestwood Center Sacramento scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

3/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−201.5

2017→2023

Crestwood Center Sacramento injury rate improved

Crestwood Center Sacramento's TCR fell 201.5 from 231.9 in 2017 to 30.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 231.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=231.9 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=21.3 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=30.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.7 · 492% of ind

  • DART 21.9 DART
  • RANK #165/177
  • PHOTO Andrew Residence
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andrew Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Crestwood Center Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crestwood Center Sacramento averages 18.7 TCR (492% of the Mental health facilities, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crestwood Center Sacramento TCR series: 2017=231.9 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=21.3 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=30.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Crestwood Center Sacramento falls in its industry

1,165 Mental health facilities, resi establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #165 safest of 177 Mental health facilities, resi employers in California.

Crestwood Center Sacramento (122 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crestwood Center Sacramento
Crestwood Center Sacramento (122 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Crestwood Center Sacramento has more employees than the Mental health facilities, residential median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 30.5 21.9 17 8 1
2022 20.9 19.7 6 11 0
2021 21.3 18.2 12 2 0
2020 19.6 17.6 2 8 0
2019 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2017 231.9 231.9 3 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · CA · Sacramento

1,165 Mental health facilities, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andrew Residence 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Excelsior ICC 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Amistad Foundation, Inc. 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charis Youth Center- Nikao House 19.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chase Ranch 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGrath Ranch 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sran Ag ll 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Regency Woodland 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1440 Ctv34 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-ILM-WILMINGTON-ILM-PDMT 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Ronde Retirement 18.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atria North Point 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quikrete - Dal 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO008 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Woodlands 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.