Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) · Georgia

Regional Port Operations Contract

Woodbine, GA · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regional Port Operations Contract runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) workplace, earning a grade A.

Regional Port Operations Contract: 1.9 TCR = 43% of Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regional Port Operations Contract safety composite

Regional Port Operations Contract scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Regional Port Operations Contract held a steady TCR band

Regional Port Operations Contract's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.4 in 2021 to 2.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488310 · Woodbine, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Canaveral Cargo Term…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Canaveral Cargo Terminal (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Regional Port Operations Contract in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regional Port Operations Contract averages 1.9 TCR (43% of the Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regional Port Operations Contract TCR series: 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Regional Port Operations Contract falls in its industry

81 Maintenance services, waterfro establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Maintenance services, waterfro employers in Georgia.

Regional Port Operations Contract (74 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Regional Port Operations Contract
Regional Port Operations Contract (74 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Regional Port Operations Contract has more employees than the Maintenance services, waterfront termina median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488310 · GA · Woodbine

81 Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 5 employers in Woodbine, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Canaveral Cargo Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PENN Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR APM Terminals Port Elizabeth 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Convent Marine Terminal 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alma IQF Facility 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Guthrie, KY 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Hands Leasing 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pinkerton & Laws 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR S0113 - Peachtree Project 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Synergy Recycling LLC 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodbine Tube Plant 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR AgLogic Chemical LLC 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Crane Equipment & Service of Illinois, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60021 Beaumont 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gas Field Specialists - 1 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4089 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Taylor's Industrial Coatings, Incorporated - Branch 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springboro Operations 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ervin Amasteel-Butler Plant 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC Highway 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.