Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing · South Carolina

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina

Liberty, SC · ~769 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina safety composite

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina injury rate improved

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333998 · Liberty, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK P50
  • PHOTO Fairbanks Scales
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 190 inj
  • SIZE ~769 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fairbanks Scales (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina falls in its industry

34 Sprinkler systems, automatic f establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina (769 employees, TCR 2.6) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 17 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina
Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina (769 employees, TCR 2.6) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina has more employees than the Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.4 15 0 0
2023 2.0 1.7 18 0 0
2022 1.7 1.6 16 0 0
2021 2.2 1.8 19 0 0
2020 2.6 2.1 16 2 0
2019 4.2 3.0 28 2 0
2018 1.7 1.4 31 3 0
2017 4.2 3.3 28 0 0
2016 3.2 2.6 19 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333998 · SC · Liberty

34 Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 18 employers in Liberty, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fairbanks Scales 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holtec Gas Systems, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Preco, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jupiter Electric Corporation DBA Liberty Systems 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gestamp South Carolina 768 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanchard Machinery 768 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jonesville DC 773 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgetown County 765 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Liberty 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Waffle Company 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRM Liberty SC 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Plastics Group - Liberty 262 FTE
NAT-TCR US Ecology Atlanta 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kohel Interstate Transport 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health - PD - Tolleson, AZ 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR foster 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE NGK Ceramics USA, Inc. 769 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Denny's 769 FTE
NAT-SIZE Krones 769 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campbell County Government 769 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.