Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing · South Carolina

Gestamp South Carolina

Union, SC · ~768 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gestamp South Carolina runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Gestamp South Carolina: 3.0 TCR = 56% of Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gestamp South Carolina safety composite

Gestamp South Carolina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gestamp South Carolina: 3.0 → 657.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 657.6 TCR · DART/TCR 215.6× in 2024

Gestamp South Carolina's TCR rose 654.5 from 3.0 in 2021 to 657.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 215.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Union, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 56% of ind

  • DART 657.6 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO Austin Tri-Hawk Auto…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~768 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Austin Tri-Hawk Automotive, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gestamp South Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gestamp South Carolina averages 3.0 TCR (56% of the Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gestamp South Carolina TCR series: 2021=3 · 2024=657.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Gestamp South Carolina falls in its industry

510 Motor vehicle metal stampings establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Motor vehicle metal stampings employers in South Carolina.

Gestamp South Carolina (768 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Gestamp South Carolina
Gestamp South Carolina (768 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Gestamp South Carolina has more employees than the Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., bod median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 657.6 657.6 7 0 0
2021 3.0 1.6 30 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · SC · Union

510 Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 27 employers in Union, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Austin Tri-Hawk Automotive, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utica Metal Products, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mancor Ohio Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auto Metal Craft 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blanchard Machinery 768 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reliable Automatic Sprinkler - South Carolina 769 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgetown County 765 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUMTER SC 763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gestamp SC LLC 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyger River 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyger River Plant 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 629 252 FTE
NAT-TCR Smithfield Foods 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Miami 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HUSCO International Maquoketa 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jerry's Trenching Service, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Copa Health 768 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stryker Corporation Shared Services 768 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Choice Bronx 768 FTE
NAT-SIZE Archer Daniels Midland 768 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.