Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary · South Carolina

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington

Darlington, SC · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary workplace, earning a grade F.

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington: 7.2 TCR = 217% of Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington safety composite

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington: 4.3 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2019

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington's TCR rose 5.8 from 4.3 in 2018 to 10.1 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · Darlington, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 217% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Sanders Lead Company…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanders Lead Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington averages 7.2 TCR (217% of the Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington falls in its industry

132 Smelting and refining of nonfe establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Smelting and refining of nonfe employers in South Carolina.

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington (38 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington
Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington (38 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington has fewer employees than the Smelting and refining of nonferrous meta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.1 5.0 2 2 0
2018 4.3 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · SC · Darlington

132 Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 38 employers in Darlington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanders Lead Company, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Tungsten 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luxfer Hart/Tamaqua 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Metals Manufacturing 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Anderson 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Orchard Management 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE STOREROOM OPERATIONS CENTER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fleet/Radio (Columbia) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel South Carolina (Darlington) 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Darlington County 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC264 Darlington (Dixie) 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7188 239 FTE
NAT-TCR Perpetual Recycling Solutions 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Toyobo 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bio Oregon Protein 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Villaume Industries, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ITT Goulds Pumps Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Buckhead 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE MediWaste Disposal 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caregiver Services of Bartlesville 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.