Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary · Alabama

Sanders Lead Company, Inc.

Troy, AL · ~478 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary workplace, earning a grade F.

Sanders Lead Company, Inc.: 7.2 TCR = 218% of Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. safety composite

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.1

2016→2024

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Sanders Lead Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 13.1 from 17.7 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.7 · 2017=13.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · Troy, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 218% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK P12
  • PHOTO Remelt Sources Inc.,…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 202 inj
  • SIZE ~478 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanders Lead Company, Inc. averages 7.2 TCR (218% of the Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=17.7 · 2017=13.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanders Lead Company, Inc. falls in its industry

132 Smelting and refining of nonfe establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Sanders Lead Company, Inc. (478 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanders Lead Company, Inc.
Sanders Lead Company, Inc. (478 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Sanders Lead Company, Inc. has more employees than the Smelting and refining of nonferrous meta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 3.7 17 7 0
2023 4.9 3.9 20 4 0
2022 3.1 1.8 13 1 0
2021 3.5 2.8 12 4 0
2019 3.3 2.5 14 3 0
2017 13.1 10.3 57 9 0
2016 17.7 12.2 69 18 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · AL · Troy

132 Smelting and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper), secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 52 employers in Troy, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Remelt Sources Inc., Darlington 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Tungsten 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luxfer Hart/Tamaqua 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Metals Manufacturing 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JACKSON, AL 478 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glovis America- VPC MA 478 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nucor Steel Tuscaloosa, Inc. 477 FTE
STATE-SIZE UAB Callahan Eye Hospital 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Troy Campus (1046) 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Troy 299 Airport Blvd (5209) 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Troy Airport Blvd (5209) 387 FTE
NAT-TCR TMX2048 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 8929 Zephyrhills 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2659 S Attleboro 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Transpak - DIV 120 Santa Ana 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Summit Packaging Systems 478 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orgill Sikeston Distribution Center 478 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kite Pharma TCF05 Manufacturing Facility 478 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insulations, LLC. Houston 478 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.