Seat cushions, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing · Michigan

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell

Farwell, MI · ~191 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Seat cushions, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell: 7.7 TCR = 233% of Seat cushions, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell safety composite

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2019

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell injury rate improved

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell's TCR fell 5.4 from 11.1 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Farwell, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 233% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #27/32
  • PHOTO Milcut Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milcut Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell averages 7.7 TCR (233% of the Seat cushions, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=5.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell falls in its industry

474 Seat cushions, foam plastics ( establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 32 Seat cushions, foam plastics ( employers in Michigan.

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell (191 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell
Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell (191 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Renosol Seating, LLC - Farwell has more employees than the Seat cushions, foam plastics (except pol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.7 2.1 11 0 0
2018 6.3 2.3 10 4 0
2016 11.1 4.2 9 15 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · MI · Farwell

474 Seat cushions, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 7 employers in Farwell, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milcut Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FoamPartner - Rochester Hills 1 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renosol Corporation 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prestige Fabricator's Inc. Plant 2 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roskam Foods M2 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knape and Vogt Eastern 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warren Screw Products, Inc. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Humanetics Michigan 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Farwell 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melling Products North LLC 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Woods Nursing Center 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melling Products 77 FTE
NAT-TCR Steele Hill Resorts 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR United Home for Aged Hebrews 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4113-41131003-R23 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarke Power Services, INC. 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louisville Water Company Corporate Headquarters 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avalign Instruments and Implants 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGTS-X975 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Elmwood Park 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.