Landfills · Michigan

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill

New Boston, MI · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landfills workplace, earning a grade F.

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill: 6.0 TCR = 230% of Landfills BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill safety composite

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill: 2.5 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2023

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill's TCR rose 7.1 from 2.5 in 2022 to 9.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · New Boston, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 230% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Refuse Division - Ka…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Refuse Division - Kapaa Transfer Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill averages 6.0 TCR (230% of the Landfills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2023=9.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill falls in its industry

288 Landfills establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Landfills employers in Michigan.

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill (28 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill
Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill (28 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill has fewer employees than the Landfills median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.5 7.1 4 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · MI · New Boston

288 Landfills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 20 employers in New Boston, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Refuse Division - Kapaa Transfer Station 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wailuku Refuse Base Yard 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Environmental Systems, LP 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03957 - Butterfield Station Landfill 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamlin Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crossroads Dairy 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse Assembly DBA Grand Traverse Pallet 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zeeland Generation 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brose New Boston INC. 949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium (Huron) 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huron 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Huron 354 FTE
NAT-TCR The Willows Foundation 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Creston Specialty Care 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Knoxville TN 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Don Quijote Pearl City Store 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Soto Company 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luxfer Hart/Tamaqua 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pace Vacaville 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.