Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing · Michigan

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser

Fraser, MI · ~93 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser: 5.3 TCR = 162% of Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser safety composite

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser: 2.9 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2024

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser's TCR rose 1.2 from 2.9 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Fraser, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #155/218
  • PHOTO Plastic Ingenuity, I…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser averages 5.3 TCR (162% of the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=10 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser falls in its industry

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and ext establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 218 Motor vehicle moldings and ext employers in Michigan.

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser (93 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser
Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser (93 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 1.4 2 1 0
2023 10.0 3.0 7 3 0
2022 8.2 2.3 7 0 0
2021 2.8 1.9 3 0 0
2020 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2019 2.9 1.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MI · Fraser

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 40 employers in Fraser, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eger Products Plant 2 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TASUS 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HTI Spartnaburg 3 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trenton Channel Power Point 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Presque Isle Electric & Gas Coop 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan UCI 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE 13001 Merriman Rd., Livonia, MI 48150 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia - Fraser 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia Fraser 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer 145 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Healthmark Industries Co. 287 FTE
NAT-TCR Edwards Mooney & Moses 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Keystone RV Company - Plant 20 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Rim Log Scaling Bureau, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Willis Corporation 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE JS Paris Excavating Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hood Container Charlotte 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stonebridge Marble Hill 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE GME Egg Harbor 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.