Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · North Carolina

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford

Oxford, NC · ~68 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford: 5.3 TCR = 162% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford safety composite

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2022

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford injury rate improved

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford's TCR fell 3.4 from 8.5 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Oxford, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #106/132
  • PHOTO Revere Plastics Syst…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford averages 5.3 TCR (162% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 132 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in North Carolina.

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford (68 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford
Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford (68 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. - Oxford has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.1 3.1 5 0 0
2021 5.2 2.6 4 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2019 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2017 5.3 3.5 3 0 0
2016 8.5 3.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Oxford

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Oxford, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Revere Plastics Systems - Fraser 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eger Products Plant 2 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TASUS 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HTI Spartnaburg 3 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsboro 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheville Skyland Fossil and CT Plants 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rehab Builders, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE KRG Utility, Inc 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Revlon Consumer Products Corp 1,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Revlon 1,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oxford NC Plant 1,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granville County 319 FTE
NAT-TCR Manheim Atlanta 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Auberge at Cypresswood 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6925-LAX 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PUBLIC SERVICE OF NEW MEXICO - San Juan 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE MFL, LLC (dba Anderson Mazda) 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evans Chemetics 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-3-Williams Sonoma 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.