Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · South Carolina

Reynolds Company

Greenville, SC · ~136 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reynolds Company runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Reynolds Company: 2.7 TCR = 81% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reynolds Company safety composite

Reynolds Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Reynolds Company injury rate improved

Reynolds Company's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.3 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Pacific Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Reynolds Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reynolds Company averages 2.7 TCR (81% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reynolds Company TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Reynolds Company falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in South Carolina.

Reynolds Company (136 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reynolds Company
Reynolds Company (136 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Reynolds Company has more employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.9 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2021 3.2 0.0 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.7 2.7 7 0 0
2018 4.9 3.5 7 0 0
2017 4.3 2.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · SC · Greenville

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific Plant 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW Performance Polymers Danvers Plant 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkel US Operations Corporation - Mentor 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkel US Operations Corporation - Cleveland 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waldrop Inc 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkdale America LLC Plant 7 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milliken & Company Dewey Plant 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE AP Carolina 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Eversource - Wareham 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Gray Terminal 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S02881 - WM Houston Metro 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin Valleys Public Power District 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wood Health Company LLC 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virnig Manufacturing Rice MN 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Bethlehem Gardner Facility 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #28 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.