Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing · Georgia

RGG Gainesville Plant

Flowery Branch, GA · ~288 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RGG Gainesville Plant runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

RGG Gainesville Plant: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RGG Gainesville Plant safety composite

RGG Gainesville Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2020→2023

RGG Gainesville Plant injury rate improved

RGG Gainesville Plant's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.5 in 2020 to 0.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.5 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Flowery Branch, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Imperial Electric Co.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~288 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Imperial Electric Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

RGG Gainesville Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RGG Gainesville Plant averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RGG Gainesville Plant TCR series: 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where RGG Gainesville Plant falls in its industry

222 Motors, electric (except engin establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Motors, electric (except engin employers in Georgia.

RGG Gainesville Plant (288 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate RGG Gainesville Plant
RGG Gainesville Plant (288 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

RGG Gainesville Plant has more employees than the Motors, electric (except engine starting median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 7 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 6 0 0
2020 2.5 1.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · GA · Flowery Branch

222 Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 57 employers in Flowery Branch, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Imperial Electric Co. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kings Mountain - 101 Reliance Road 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDUSTRIAL COIL INC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAM Camp 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE GA - Norcross - 1870 Beaver Ridge Circle - The American Bottling Company 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lenbrook 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSL 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Service Headquarters Forest Park 62 Lake Mirror Rd 212 Lake Mirror Rd Forest Park GA 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR GNV 972 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kings Hawaiian 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR King's Hawaiian Bakery Southeast Inc 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR ZF-Flowery Branch 474 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Painting - TX 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Victory Fire Protection, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Elgiloy Specialty Metals - Sycamore 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Opal-Foods Hathaway Farm 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-4190 EAGLE HILL DRIVE 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Famarock dba Rockenwagner 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nutra Blend - Neosho 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon 288 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.