Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing · Minnesota

Rhino, Inc.

Maple Lake, MN · ~124 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rhino, Inc. runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Rhino, Inc.: 7.8 TCR = 236% of Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rhino, Inc. safety composite

Rhino, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.2

2017→2024

Rhino, Inc. injury rate improved

Rhino, Inc.'s TCR fell 16.2 from 20.4 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=20.4 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Maple Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 236% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #13/15
  • PHOTO Star Thermoplastics …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Star Thermoplastics Alloys and Rubbers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Rhino, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rhino, Inc. averages 7.8 TCR (236% of the Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rhino, Inc. TCR series: 2017=20.4 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Rhino, Inc. falls in its industry

644 Resins, plastics (except custo establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 15 Resins, plastics (except custo employers in Minnesota.

Rhino, Inc. (124 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Rhino, Inc.
Rhino, Inc. (124 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Rhino, Inc. has more employees than the Resins, plastics (except custom compound median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.8 6 0 0
2023 6.2 2.3 8 0 0
2022 6.5 2.6 10 0 0
2021 8.2 3.4 12 0 0
2020 6.3 3.8 5 0 0
2019 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2017 20.4 7.7 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · MN · Maple Lake

644 Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 11 employers in Maple Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Star Thermoplastics Alloys and Rubbers Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Devices Corp. 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JPS 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reese Enterprises, Inc. - MN 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE S.J. Louis Construction, INC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Restoration Corporation 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE USI (Hastings/Rogers, MN) 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4374 St Cloud MN Container 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR MP NEXLEVEL, LLC 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR HIGH SCHOOL (200) 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR ELEMENTARY (100) 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bernatello's Pizza, Inc. - Sales 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Lancaster Burns Construction, Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR M-12 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Matthews Store 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wastewater Enterprise 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broward Builders, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE MFM Contracting Corp 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA IL Matteson Plant 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE E J Basler Factory 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.