Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · California

Wastewater Enterprise

San Francisco, CA · ~496 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wastewater Enterprise runs at 649% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Wastewater Enterprise: 7.8 TCR = 649% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wastewater Enterprise safety composite

Wastewater Enterprise scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2024

Wastewater Enterprise injury rate improved

Wastewater Enterprise's TCR fell 3.3 from 9.5 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.5 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 649% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #55/74
  • PHOTO Macon Office
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 196 inj
  • SIZE ~496 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Macon Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wastewater Enterprise in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wastewater Enterprise averages 7.8 TCR (649% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wastewater Enterprise TCR series: 2017=9.5 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Wastewater Enterprise falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 74 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in California.

Wastewater Enterprise (496 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wastewater Enterprise
Wastewater Enterprise (496 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Wastewater Enterprise has more employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 4.8 17 5 0
2023 6.7 5.3 21 2 0
2022 9.4 9.0 27 2 0
2021 5.0 3.5 17 0 0
2020 7.7 5.2 26 2 0
2019 5.9 4.9 21 2 0
2018 11.9 6.8 31 15 0
2017 9.5 8.2 36 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · San Francisco

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Macon Office 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bailard 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Field's Point Wastewater Treatment Facility 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Four Rivers Sanitation Authority 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Valley Construction Inc. 496 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Packing Company 496 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nongshim America, Inc. 496 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ajinomoto Althea 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Matthews Store 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR M-12 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rhino, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Colorado- Circle Retail 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater Complex 496 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Higbee Company, LLC 496 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waco Plant 496 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Motion Plant 1 496 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.